Hi Steve,

Thank you – this was a really helpful list!

In the end we’ve contacted

Steve and Johnny for Muons (Rob recommended Johnny in addition to Steve)

Stewart and Sanghamitra for Mol Spec (Rob recommend Sanghamitra in addition to Stewart)

Max for Reflectometry (on Rachel’s recommendation)

Daniel Bowron for Disorded Materials

Rob Bewley

Daniel has already responded to say that he gives assent for the epic.

When we put the original call out we also received a response from Hamish Cavaye, one of the Mol Spec scientists. He wasn’t able to be a stakeholder but provided feedback that was used when writing the epic. We decided to reach out to him for comments on the epic as we felt he had shown and interest and we wanted to check he felt we had incorporated what he needed into the epic. We did this at the same time as contacting those in the list above. He has responded to say he’s happy with the epic. In fact Travis Williams, the Excitations stakeholder, has been keeping in touch with him about it so he’s feeling `very well represented` (in his words!).

I would still like input from Stewart and/or Sanghamitra for Mol Spec but we are trying to ensure we have consulted widely enough.

Thanks

Sarah

Well, problem is the ISIS Group Leaders distribution list hits all GL’s.

Looking at the names on the Epic, the obvious science groups not represented directly (assuming SteveC doesn’t respond to put his hand up!) are the ones your list, Sarah, plus Disordered Materials. So drop a line to Stewart, Adi, John & Daniel.

Might also be worth including Rob Bewley.

If you think it would be more impactful coming from another scientist, I’m happy to ask them for you!

Steve

I would just send to group leaders and let them volunteer someone. We already asked for volunteer and these groups didn’t engage

Sent from my iPhone

On 16 Oct 2024, at 08:11, Sarah Foxley - STFC UKRI <sarah.foxley@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:



Dear all,

 

Looking back at my notes from the prioritisation meeting last week I realised that I didn’t have all the information I need. With regards the Instrument View epic which areas do we need to show the Epic to and get sign off? I want to be very clear about this to avoid any further problems with this epic.

 

I think it is just

 

1.      Molecular Spectroscopy

2.      Muons

3.      Reflectometry

 

Is that correct?

 

They don’t need to be stakeholders – just review the epic, provide feedback and once they are happy say that they agree with it.

 

Thanks

 

Sarah

 

Sarah Foxley

Mantid Team Lead and Engineering Manager

Science and Technology Facilities Council

Phone – 01235 446938

sarah.foxley@stfc.ukri.org

She/Her/Hers

<image001.png>

 

_______________________________________________
Mantid Programme Board mailing list -- mpb@mantidproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mpb-leave@mantidproject.org