[Mpb] Re: Epics

Hello, Later today, I will be sending out an email specifying which epics require to be reviewed. So unlike last time, MPB will have approximately two weeks to review them (add comments where clarifications are needed so that we can address them prior to the meeting) Thanks. -- Januka Product Manager Scientific Software Group ISIS/STFC [https://res-h3.public.cdn.office.net/assets/bookwithme/misc/CalendarPerson2… Book time to meet with me<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a795b198fd04ba288e4fb1596… ________________________________ From: Pascal Manuel - STFC UKRI &lt;pascal.manuel(a)stfc.ac.uk&gt; Sent: 01 November 2023 10:37 To: King, Stephen (STFC,RAL,ISIS) &lt;stephen.king(a)stfc.ac.uk&gt;uk>; mpb(a)mantidproject.org &lt;mpb(a)mantidproject.org&gt; Subject: [Mpb] Re: Epics Hi all, I second that, esp. as beam is running from 14/11. Best, P ________________________________ From: Stephen King - STFC UKRI &lt;stephen.king(a)stfc.ac.uk&gt; Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 10:05 AM To: mpb(a)mantidproject.org &lt;mpb(a)mantidproject.org&gt; Subject: [Mpb] Epics Morning All, I see lots of activity updating the epics on the Kanban board ahead of our meeting on Nov 15. Which is good. But presumably, ahead of the meeting, we are all going to be expected to have reviewed them (or at least a subset)? So I have two questions: 1) Which epics will require reviewing (which columns), and; 2) How much notice are we going to get that they are ready for review? Last meeting we were barely given two working days which was too short… Perhaps we could agree an Epic Freeze date? Steve