Dear all,
Looking back at my notes from the prioritisation meeting last week I realised that I didn't have all the information I need. With regards the Instrument View epic which areas do we need to show the Epic to and get sign off? I want to be very clear about this to avoid any further problems with this epic.
I think it is just
- Molecular Spectroscopy
- Muons
- Reflectometry
Is that correct?
They don't need to be stakeholders - just review the epic, provide feedback and once they are happy say that they agree with it.
Thanks
Sarah
Sarah Foxley
Mantid Team Lead and Engineering Manager
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Phone - 01235 446938
sarah.foxley(a)stfc.ukri.org<mailto:sarah.foxley@stfc.ukri.org>
She/Her/Hers
[stfc_logo]
Dear all,
Anders is not available to chair the meeting on Wednesday and so I will be chairing instead with Januka leading on the Epic Board parts.
Jonathan has updated the agenda - MPB Epic Prioritisation Agenda 2024-10-09<https://stfc365.sharepoint.com/:w:/r/sites/MantidProgrammeBoard/Shared%20Do…>
We have 1 Epic in the Implementing (Persevere) column and a further 5 in the Analyzing column to decide whether or not to continue with. If you can therefore take a look at these before the meeting to help speed up discussions on the day? Remember you will be able to ask Richard questions about the Bragg Peak Epic in the Implementing (Persevere) column as part of his presentation to help with your decision making.
Thanks
Sarah
Sarah Foxley
Mantid Team Lead and Engineering Manager
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Phone - 01235 446938
sarah.foxley(a)stfc.ukri.org<mailto:sarah.foxley@stfc.ukri.org>
She/Her/Hers
[stfc_logo]
